Contact
+32 497 262714stijn.bruers@gmail.com-
Meest recente berichten
Tags
- animal advocacy
- animal rights
- animal welfare
- anti-arbitrariness
- antiwillekeur
- artificial intelligence
- artificiële intelligentie
- atheïsme
- basic right
- biodiversity
- cause prioritization
- cell-based meat
- cellular agriculture
- climate
- climate change
- co2 emissions
- cognitive bias
- consistency
- consistentie
- dierenleed
- dierenrechten
- dierproeven
- discriminatie
- discrimination
- EA Forum
- ecologie
- ecologische economie
- ecologische ethiek
- economics
- economie
- effectief altruïsme
- effective activism
- effective altruism
- effective animal advocacy
- effective environmentalism
- environment
- equality
- ethical principles
- ethische principes
- existential risks
- existentieel risico
- geweldloosheid
- gezinsplanning
- ggo's
- GMO
- gulden regel
- health
- liberalisme
- migratie
- milieu
- moral illusions
- moral principles
- morele illusies
- organic food
- overbevolking
- politics
- population ethics
- pseudowetenschap
- rational ethics
- rationality
- rationele ethiek
- science
- sentience
- speciesism
- strategy
- universele liefde
- unwanted arbitrariness
- utilitarianism
- utility
- variable critical level utilitarianism
- veganism
- veganisme
- well-being
- wetenschap
- wild animal suffering
Recente reacties
Rob Visser op Blank of wit? Bedenkingen bij… Rob Visser op Blank of wit? Bedenkingen bij… stijnbruers op Blank of wit? Bedenkingen bij… Rob Visser op Blank of wit? Bedenkingen bij… stijnbruers op Kennis van drogredenen maakt j… Meta
Tagarchief: golden rice
Some inconsistencies in food environmentalism
Sometimes environmentalists propose ineffective measures to improve public health and environmental sustainability. These ineffective measures are the result of irrational opinions held by those environmentalists. Sometimes these irrationalities consist of clear and simple inconsistencies in their ideas. Finding these inconsistencies … Lees verder
Stijn Bruers, the rational ethicist 