Contact
+32 497 262714stijn.bruers@gmail.com-
Meest recente berichten
Tags
- animal advocacy
- animal rights
- animal welfare
- anti-arbitrariness
- antiwillekeur
- artificial intelligence
- artificiële intelligentie
- atheïsme
- basic right
- biodiversity
- cause prioritization
- cell-based meat
- cellular agriculture
- climate
- climate change
- co2 emissions
- cognitive bias
- consistency
- consistentie
- dierenleed
- dierenrechten
- dierproeven
- discriminatie
- discrimination
- EA Forum
- ecologie
- ecologische economie
- ecologische ethiek
- economics
- economie
- effectief altruïsme
- effective activism
- effective altruism
- effective animal advocacy
- effective environmentalism
- environment
- equality
- ethical principles
- ethische principes
- existential risks
- existentieel risico
- geweldloosheid
- gezinsplanning
- ggo's
- GMO
- gulden regel
- health
- liberalisme
- migratie
- milieu
- moral illusions
- moral philosophy
- moral principles
- morele illusies
- organic food
- overbevolking
- politics
- population ethics
- pseudowetenschap
- rational ethics
- rationality
- rationele ethiek
- science
- sentience
- speciesism
- strategy
- universele liefde
- utilitarianism
- utility
- variable critical level utilitarianism
- veganism
- veganisme
- well-being
- wetenschap
- wild animal suffering
Recente reacties
stijnbruers op The case against degrowth stijnbruers op The case against degrowth Elwin op The case against degrowth Elwin op The case against degrowth stijnbruers op The case against degrowth Meta
Tagarchief: wild animal welfarism
The priority for strong personal-state preferences (and implications for wild animal welfare)
This article describes a very fundamental idea in ethics: that we should give priority to the satisfaction of the strongest personal-state preferences. A personal-state preference is a preference held by an individual that refers to the state of that individual, … Lees verder
Relativistic welfare, farm animal abolitionism and wild animal welfarism
Brief summary: whether someone’s aggregate welfare is positive or negative is morally relevant. If welfare is negative, life is not worth living and it would be better not to exist (or better to be euthanized). However, especially when it comes … Lees verder
Stijn Bruers, the rational ethicist 